Tag Archives: LEONG SZE HIAN

Recently, Singaporeans stood together to help Leong Sze Hian and Roy Ngerng pay PM Lee for their libel lawsuits (S$133k + S$129k and S$150k respectively). Ex-NMP Calvin Cheng had something to say about that. In a Facebook post on 17 April, he complained that the amount they had to pay …

This comes after successful crowdfunding efforts by Leong Sze Hian and Roy Ngerng who have paid off a lot of what they are supposed to give to LHL.

PM Lee is seeking another S$129,327 in legal costs and disbursements from blogger Leong Sze Hian after winning the libel suit. To recap, Leong was sued for sharing on his Facebook an article falsely linking PM Lee to the 1MDB corruption scandal in Malaysia. Following the defamation suit, the high …

Dear Editorial Team, I am penning this in support of Roy Ngerng, who is in exile overseas so he can work and pay off a debt he owes to our already over bloated PM through constant victories in a series of defamation suits. Roy is well educated and holds a fairly decent well-paying job, that …

On 17 December 2015, blogger Roy Ngerng was found guilty for a blogpost that had allegedly defamed the Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore, and he was ordered by the Supreme Court to pay the PM S$150,000 in damages. Following the success of Leong Sze Hian in raising S$133,000 …

He and his lawyer, Lim Tean, has been asking for donations ever since he was found guilty of defaming Lee Hsien Loong by simply sharing a Facebook post.

He may be able to prevent people from talking badly about him, but he cannot prevent them from thinking badly about him.

Lawyer Lim Tean recently defended Leong Sze Hian and Terry Xu against Lee Hsien Loong over the 38 Oxley Road saga. Lim Tean shared how these defamation suits may have backfired against Lee Hsien Loong

Lim Tean has punched holes into the defence built by the PM's legal team: (1) why did Lee Hsien Loong not sue The States Review or The Coverage and (2) the expert witness Dr Phan could not be totally independent.

According to news reports, all tickets for this open Court hearing were snapped up by 7AM this morning. This revelation caused lawyer Khush Chopra to comment "I wonder who knew the unusually early time that queue numbers would be issued and that only 20 seats in the public gallery would be available. I’m not sure you can say that this trial is being conducted in open court that anyone is allowed to attend in these circumstances."