After that dialogue, Kenny dashed off a heated note entitled:"8 (Intellectually) Dishonest Things About Hri Kumar’s Honest Conversation" in which he complained that he was "shouted down" by several people who appear to have been planted in the audience. How did he know that they were planted? Did he see them exchange the secret PAP Internet Brigade Handshake?
Interestingly, the word "Intellectually" appears to have been subsequently added. It is missing in the post's URL and when The Online Citizen - that bastion of free speech - shared it on 16 June, the title was "8 Dishonest Things About Hri Kumar's Honest Conversation"
Kenny J later threw in a qualifier:
Here's something that Kenny J said Hri Kumar said:
The Pundit found an audio recording of the Dialogue uploaded onto YouTube by a Mr Ernest Pak. What Hri Kumar actually said was:
If you have a proposal where you want any particular group of people to take on more risks..(corrects himself) to get more, then we have to recognize that if we want one group to have more we will also have to recognize that one group will get less. So I think let's be honest about it. But that's not wrong. There are no wrong answers there. If you think that the older generation should get more. That's fine. That's a valid view to take. But you also have to address and identify who do you think have to sacrifice so that others will get more.
In "Disruptive Politics", Hri Kumar clarified that he was referring to weighing CPF payouts: "What I really said was that if the Forum participants proposed higher payouts for some groups, then other groups will have less. I did not say that “any change” would mean taking from one group and giving to another. That is ridiculous." It is ridiculous. Kenny did a Reductio ad absurdum sleight o' hand there. Hri Kumar did not mean to say that changing the CPF system involves dipping into one group of people's money to give to another group. The notion doesn't even make sense.
Here's another example of Kenny's distortion of what Hri Kumar said:
It's commonly said that you know we shouldn't put Singaporeans down. They know what to do with their money. They are all not going to run to the casinos and gamble it away. We are not saying that. We are not saying that at all. But people lose money for different reasons. Some people gamble it away, maybe a minority. Some people just make bad investments. Some people just have bad luck. You know..different people are put in different circumstances.
Hri Kumar went on to say that wanting to manage your own money is "a perfectly legitimate point" but there will be a fairly sizable group of people who will run out of funds and they still need to live and "as a nation we will have to make sure that no one suffers." Anyone with a decent level of Comprehension can see that Hri Kumar didn't even remotely suggest that Singaporeans would "inevitably" squander their money away.
In "Disruptive Politics", Hri Kumar claims that Kenny J attributed statements to him that he has never made. By now it should be clear that Kenny has been a naughty boy, playing fast and loose with Hri Kumar's words to score political points. Will that Kenny show up at the CPF dialogue that Kee Chiu will host next month? As we say in Singapore: Akan Datang.