STRAITS TIMES MISREPRESENTS OUTCOME OF POHA APPEAL

Advertisement

<Facebook post by Lisa Li>

The Straits Times Facebook post* only mentions the dissenting judgment that got OUT-VOTED. The outcome of the case was the exact opposite - the judges decided that the Government is NOT a person who can sue for harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act. Can liddat one meh? Judging from comments, this has misled some people already.

*Just to clarify - the actual judgment is in the article, but I think most people would reasonably assume the Facebook excerpt would reflect - not contradict - the final decision. Confusing messaging.

Compare coverage on:
- Yahoo (https://sg.news.yahoo.com/appeal-court-rules-against-mindef…)
- TOC (http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/…/court-of-appeal-rules-th…/)
- The Straits Times (http://www.straitstimes.com/…/is-govt-a-person-court-rules-…)

Editor's Note: 

Do you have a story to share? Please use our submission form or email us at editorial@allsingaporestuff.com. If not, why not give us a 'Like'?

Filed Under: 

Tags: 

Advertisement

Your Views