Former AMP director Mohd Nizam Ismail owes $118k in taxes

A FORMER director of the Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP) has failed to get a court order to stop the taxman from coming after him to make good on tax arrears totalling $117,716.

If Mr Mohd Nizam Ismail does not meet the statutory demand to settle his debt, bankruptcy proceedings can be started against him.

But this worry has been allayed for the 46-year-old lawyer and former deputy public prosecutor for now, having reached a settlement with the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras).

He said through his lawyer See Chern Yang last night, that the "parties have reached a mutually acceptable arrangement out of court".

Mr Nizam, who has been working as a lawyer drawing $18,000 a month since last July, is a civil society activist who stepped down from the AMP last April. The statutory demand relates to unpaid taxes for three years from 2010.

Mr Nizam argued that he had worked out an instalment agreement with the Iras in March last year, which it was trying to back out of. He said he had kept to an instalment plan in 2012 but was retrenched in January 2013. That made payments difficult until he came to a new agreement with the taxman two months later.


But High Court assistant registrar Janice Wong said in judgment grounds released yesterday that she found the agreement "unworkable" and so unclear as to make it void. She said the deal was for parties to meet and reach a "reasonable agreement" on future instalments after the initial two-month period, during which he made part payments. But there was no agreed criteria or clarity as to what would amount to a "reasonable agreement".

It would be "odd" to expect the taxman to "hold his hands" until a "reasonable agreement" had been reached, she added.

She noted the Comptroller had repeatedly made clear in letters from May 2 onwards that enforcement action would be taken if Mr Nizam did not settle the arrears.

Ms Wong further rejected Mr Nizam's claim that he relied on the agreement with the taxman as he had other financial obligations such as the maintenance of his ex-wife and children, and the payment of friendly loans.

She said: "He fought off the most pressing fires by borrowing money to pay off those creditors. (He) must have known that in relation to the debt owed to the (Comptroller), he could buy some time, but actions to recover the debt would ultimately be brought against him."

By July, he was a law partner earning $18,000 a month, she said. In August, the Comptroller had offered to allow him a final payment plan of $13,000 a month, which would clear the debt by September this year.

But he had countered with monthly payments of $6,000 to end in November next year.

The Comptroller rejected the proposal in October, pointing to the long-outstanding tax arrears and the many attempts to accommodate Mr Nizam. The statutory demand then followed.

Responding to queries, an Iras spokesman said yesterday that over the past five years, there have been only three applications including this one to set aside a statutory demand and all were rejected by the courts.

"We will take appropriate actions to recover the outstanding taxes owed by the taxpayer to the State," he added.


Filed Under: 



I find it a little disturbing

I find it a little disturbing that you should choose this picture which includes a minor and a woman whom I assume is his wife and probably has nothing to do with his tax issues. Please take down this picture or at the very least blur out the minor's face. Thank you for your kind actions.

I think the picture is

I think the picture is inappropriate.. Please remove the picture - Why involve his wife and daughter?

Why should this even make the

Why should this even make the news? It's not newsworthy.

i don't think it is right

i don't think it is right that you use their family photo for this article. please remove this photo. the wife & child especially, are innocent.

鏃ユ檪锛?012骞?鏈?鏃ワ紙閲戯級 1830闁嬪牬 1900闁嬫紨 3鏈?0鏃ワ紙鍦燂級 1730闁嬪牬 1800闁嬫紨 浼氬牬锛氭澅浜兓楂樼敯棣牬 鏂欓噾锛氬墠澹?000鍐?褰撴棩2500鍐?銉併偙銉冦儓锛氥儹銉笺偨銉炽儊銈便儍銉?銈炽兗銉?9379 銆岄爲寮点倠銆嶄汉銇竴娴併伀銇倢銇亜

ニューバランス レディース


アディダス ランニングシューズ

鍙c偝銉?銇俱仩鍙c偝銉熴亴銇傘倞銇俱仜銈撱€?銆屽彛銈炽儫銆嶃儑銉笺偪銇€佺梾闄伄閫氫俊绨裤亱銈夋彁渚涖仌銈屻仸銇娿倞銇俱仚銆傘仹銇梾闄伕銇彛銈炽儫銈掔洿鎺ャ亰鍙椾粯銇椼仸銇娿倞銇俱仜銈撱€傜梾闄伕銇彛銈炽儫銈掓浉銇嶃亾銇裤仧銇勫牬鍚堛伅銆?鐥呴櫌銇€氫俊绨?銈掋仈鍒╃敤銇忋仩銇曘亜銆?銇撱伄鐥呴櫌銈掕銇熸柟銇€併亾銈撱仾鐥呴櫌銈傝銇︺亜銇俱仚銆?娴滅敯銇傘倱鎽╂不鐧傞櫌 锛氶噹骞屾澗涓︾敽25-51
アディダス ランニングシューズ



Your Views