Race relations have come a long way since the dark ages of communal riots and racial tensions. For the past 50 years, meritocracy has been the cornerstone on which race relations were built upon.
Singapore’s founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew was unapologetic in his approach to race in Singapore and so were the rest of our pioneer leaders. While Malaysia and Indonesia were still engaged in race politics, Singapore decided from the start that meritocracy was the only way to go.
It has been etched in our national ethos. We acknowledge these values in our Pledge when we recite the words “Regardless or race, language or religion”. Singapore has always drawn strength from its diversity and uncompromising meritocracy.
Unfortunately, meritocracy today is under threat, ironically from the same political party which was once its passionate proponent – The PAP. Somehow, the party which once championed the principle of equal opportunity for all races has decided that the best way to ensure minority representation in the Presidency is to simply reserve the entire election for a single race.
To arbitrarily block other races from running for President flies in the face of everything our founding fathers stood for. Moreover, it opens up the Pandora’s Box of race based politics. If the 2017 Presidential Election can be reserved exclusively for Malay candidates, logic dictates it’s only fair the same rule apply to every other race. The notion that a candidate can be disqualified by virtue of his skin color – a trait he/she has no choice over, is regressive and un-meritocratic.
Beyond the issue of meritocracy, therein also lies the problem of public perception. Already, the changes to the Elected President have been met with considerable backlash – both online and offline.
Click below to read rest of the article.