STRAITS TIMES MISREPRESENTS OUTCOME OF POHA APPEAL

The Straits Times Facebook post* only mentions the dissenting judgment that got OUT-VOTED. The outcome of the case was the exact opposite – the judges decided that the Government is NOT a person who can sue for harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act. Can liddat one meh? Judging from comments, this has misled some people already.

*Just to clarify – the actual judgment is in the article, but I think most people would reasonably assume the Facebook excerpt would reflect – not contradict – the final decision. Confusing messaging.

Compare coverage on:
– Yahoo (https://sg.news.yahoo.com/appeal-court-rules-against-mindef…)
– TOC (http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/…/court-of-appeal-rules-th…/)
– The Straits Times (http://www.straitstimes.com/…/is-govt-a-person-court-rules-…)

Check Also

Woman Upset By Swensen’s Staff, Regretted It When She Realised They Were Autistic

She ended her post by telling people not to be too quick to judge like her. There may be more than meets the eye.